I had a feeling in this case that this was true, but I labeled it 35mm for other reasons; the labels I use are really just selfish tags for myself referencing the format rather than the actual equipment. I was smarter with 4x5 and 67 by using the tag "4:5" as a general ratio rather than a specific designation of equipment. I should have done the same with 2:3 but never did initially as I figured 6x9 would be a rare occurrence and then I became too lazy to correct it. I may correct them at some point, particularly if I can find an automated way to do so (I'm thinking a search and replace run on the xml might do the trick).
I use these tags when I am using a certain format and want to look at examples, so I try to group the formats together according to image size ratio.
Roma doesn't photograph with 35mm film. He primarily uses 6x8 and 6x9cm cameras.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the heads-up :)
ReplyDeleteI had a feeling in this case that this was true, but I labeled it 35mm for other reasons; the labels I use are really just selfish tags for myself referencing the format rather than the actual equipment. I was smarter with 4x5 and 67 by using the tag "4:5" as a general ratio rather than a specific designation of equipment. I should have done the same with 2:3 but never did initially as I figured 6x9 would be a rare occurrence and then I became too lazy to correct it. I may correct them at some point, particularly if I can find an automated way to do so (I'm thinking a search and replace run on the xml might do the trick).
I use these tags when I am using a certain format and want to look at examples, so I try to group the formats together according to image size ratio.